MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2586868361 · doi:10.1182/blood.v106.11.100.100

The AML1-ETO Fusion Gene and the FLT3 Length Mutation Collaborate in Inducing Acute Leukemia in a Murine Bone Marrow Transplantation Model.

2005· article· en· W2586868361 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Schessl, Vijay P.S. Rawat, Monica Cusan, Aniruddha J. Deshpande, Tobias Kohl, Patricia M. Rosten, Karsten Spiekermann, R. Keith Humphries, Susanne Schnittger, Wolfgang Kern, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Leticia Quintanilla‐Martínez, Stefan K. Bohlander, Michaela Feuring‐Buske, Christian Buske

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeukemiaBone marrowFusion geneCancer researchRUNX1BiologyAcute leukemiaNeuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homologTransplantationMutationImmunologyPhenotypePoint mutationHaematopoiesisGeneStem cellMedicineGeneticsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Experimental data have shown that two of the most frequent genetic alterations in AML, the AML1-ETO (A/E) fusion gene and the FLT3 length mutation (FLT3-LM) are both mostly insufficient on their own to induce leukemia. These findings support the model that collaboration of two classes of genetic alterations, altering proliferation or differentiation, is necessary for leukemogenesis. When we first analyzed 135 patients with A/E positive AML, additional mutations affecting signal transduction were found in 38 % of all cases (FLT3-LM 10.3 %, KIT 8.1 % and NRAS 9.6 %). In contrast, none of the patient with A/E positive leukemia had alterations associated with transcriptional regulation such as MLL-PTD. To test the hypothesis that A/E collaborates with FLT3-LM in inducing acute leukemia, we transplanted mice with bone marrow (BM) cells retrovirally expressing A/E, FLT3-LM or both alterations. Mice transplanted with BM cells expressing A/E or FLT3-LM alone did not develop any disease. In contrast, mice (n=11) transplanted with BM cells expressing both alterations succumbed to an aggressive acute leukemia. Intriguingly, developing leukemias differed with regard to their phenotype with 7 animals developing AML and 4 animals developing ALL. Furthermore, the majority of AML cases showed simultaneous expression of lymphoid antigens as described in patients with A/E positive AML. The collaboration of A/E with FLT3-LM was depending on DNA binding activity of the fusion gene as the L148D point mutation in the Runx1 domain of the construct abrogated collaboration of A/E with the FLT3-LM in the CFU-S assay. Furthermore, inactivation of the kinase activity of the FLT3-LM (FLT3-LM K672R mutant) resulted in the complete loss of collaboration with the A/E fusion. Treatment of cells co-infected with A/E and FLT3-LM with the kinase inhibitor PKC412 resulted in a 62 % reduction of the CFU-S frequency. To further explore a possible contribution of retroviral insertional mutagenesis to the transformation process in this model, 10 retroviral integration sites were subcloned and sequenced from 4 leukemic mice: all 10 sites were unique with no indication of a common integration site associated with the leukemic transformation. Moreover, 5 sites were intergenic or not linked to known genes. The remaining sites were in introns in a 5′ to 3′ orientation most likely to lead to gene knockdown rather than activation. These data provide direct functional evidence for the oncogenic collaboration between A/E with a class of activating mutations, recurrently found in patients with t(8;21), and add experimental data to the clinical observation which demonstrated a significant inferior treatment outcome in patients with AML1-ETO and additional mutations of receptor tyrosine kinases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→