MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586944682 · doi:10.23887/jwl.v2i1.9125

PELATIHAN PEMBUATAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS BUDAYA BALI BAGI GURU-GURU SAINS SMP DI KECAMATAN BULELENG

2017· article· id· W2586944682 on OpenAlexaff
I Nyoman Suardana, Nyoman Retug

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL WIDYA LAKSANA · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSTEM Education
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pembelajaran berbasis budaya Bali merupakan salah satu pembelajaran inovatif yang terbukti efektif meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Budaya Bali banyak yang dapat diintegrasikan dalam pembelajaran sains kimia SMP. Integrasi budaya Bali ke dalam pembelajaran menjadikan pembelajaran lebih bermakna bagi siswa. Namun demikian, guru-guru sains SMP di Kecamatan Buleleng belum memiliki pemahaman tentang budaya Bali yang relevan dengan sains kimia SMP, pembelajaran berbasis budaya lokal, dan pembuatan perangkat pembelajarannya. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan tersebut maka dilakukan seminar dan pelatihan pembuatan perangkat pembelajaran sains kimia berbasis budaya Bali bagi guru-guru sains SMP di Kecamatan Buleleng. Seminar dan pelatihan dilaksanakan pada hari Sabtu, 27 Oktober 2012 di Ruang Lab Media Kimia FMIPA Undiksha. Guru-guru sains SMP yang hadir dalam kegiatan tersebut sebanyak14 orang dari jumlah keseluruhan undangan 26 guru. Hasil dari kegiatan tersebut adalah sebagai berikut. 1) Guru-guru sangat tekun mengikuti seminar dan pelatihan, mereka aktif mengajukan pertanyaan, dan melakukan kerja sama yang baik dalam membuat perangkat pembelajaran. 2) Meningkatnya pemahaman guru-guru sains SMP tentang budaya Bali yang relevan dengan sains kimia SMP. 3) Meningkatnya pemahaman guru- guru sains SMP tentang pembelajaran berbasis budaya lokal. 4) Meningkatnya pemahaman dan keterampilan guru-guru sains SMP dalam penyusunan perangkat pembelajaran sains kimia berbasis budaya Bali.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL WIDYA LAKSANASame topicSTEM EducationFrench-language works237,207