MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586957159 · doi:10.4000/eces.2094

Síntese do testemunho da Associação Portuguesa de Apoio à Vítima (APAV)

2016· article· pt· W2586957159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-cadernos CES · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trauma, vivências e processos: o papel das associações de apoio à vítima A APAV, Associação Portuguesa de Apoio à Vítima, cumpre, este ano, 24 anos de existência. Nestes 24 anos, temos adaptado e melhorado os nossos procedimentos na prestação dos nossos serviços no apoio a todas as vítimas de crimes. São as narrativas das vítimas que nos procuram, ou que nos são referenciadas, que servem de base ao desenvolvimento dos nossos serviços – desde a forma como dispomos o espaço dos nossos gabinetes...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it