MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586957159 · doi:10.4000/eces.2094

Síntese do testemunho da Associação Portuguesa de Apoio à Vítima (APAV)

2016· article· pt· W2586957159 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno da Silva Brito

Bibliographic record

Venuee-cadernos CES · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trauma, vivências e processos: o papel das associações de apoio à vítima A APAV, Associação Portuguesa de Apoio à Vítima, cumpre, este ano, 24 anos de existência. Nestes 24 anos, temos adaptado e melhorado os nossos procedimentos na prestação dos nossos serviços no apoio a todas as vítimas de crimes. São as narrativas das vítimas que nos procuram, ou que nos são referenciadas, que servem de base ao desenvolvimento dos nossos serviços – desde a forma como dispomos o espaço dos nossos gabinetes...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-cadernos CESSame topicDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningFrench-language works237,207