MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Condiciones para el nacimiento de la ciencia ficción española contemporánea

2016· article· es· W2586990524 on OpenAlex
Fernando Ángel Moreno Serrano, Mikel Peregrina, Steven Bermúdez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTropelías/Tropelías · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Culture and Identity
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSpanish Civil WarPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo expone los numerosos factores ‒editoriales, sociales, políticos y técnicos‒ que influyeron en el auge de la ciencia ficción española durante los años ochenta. La enorme complejidad de esta realidad histórico-literaria aporta claves para el entendimiento del desarrollo del género en España y, en general, para abrir nuevas vías de análisis de la literatura española de la segunda mitad del siglo XX. Spanish science fiction had a very good period in the decades prior to the Civil War. We wouldn´t find a similar interest until the seventies and the eighties. To start with, this was due to the New Dimension magazine and subsequently many factors contributed to the appearance of several interesting writers that, especially with their short stories, provided the best works until nowadays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it