MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586991018 · doi:10.4267/2042/61953

A spontaneous dog model for a human sensory neuropathy: identification of a mutation in the upstream region of a neurotrophic factor

2016· article· en· W2586991018 on OpenAlexaff
Solenne Correard, Jocelyn Plassais, Laëtitia Lagoutte, Manon Paradis, Éric Guaguère, Pascale Quignon, Thomas Derrien, Catherine André

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de l Académie vétérinaire de France · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlial cell line-derived neurotrophic factorNeurotrophic factorsGeneticsBiologyGeneMutationCoding regionLocus (genetics)DiseaseNeuroscienceBioinformaticsMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we sought the genetic cause of self-mutilation syndrome in sporting dogs, which corresponds to human Hereditary Sensory and Autonomic Neuropathies (HSAN). We have identified a genetic mutation upstream of the gene encoding Glial cell line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (GDNF). This mutation is responsible for insensitivity to pain in four sporting dog breeds and it perfectly segregates with the disease in 250 sporting dogs of known clinical status. Moreover, it was not found in any of the 900 unaffected dogs from 130 different breeds. Since this mutation is localized in a long non-coding RNA, we performed an in-depth analysis of the genomic region (locus) as well as gene expression analyses to understand its role in the pathophysiology of the disease. Thus, in addition to the discovery of a novel candidate gene for HSAN in humans, we propose a transcriptional regulation mechanism based on a “partnership” between GDNF and a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de l Académie vétérinaire de FranceSame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207