MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Antitumor Activity of Bortezomib (PS-341; Velcade) in a Phase II Study of Patients with Previously Untreated or Treated Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM).

2004· article· en· W2587075560 on OpenAlexaff
Christine I. Chen, Darrell White, C. Tom Kouroukis, A. Keith Stewart, Kang Howson‐Jan, Loree Larratt, Jean Powers, Elizabeth A. Eisenhauer

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital EdmontonJuravinski Cancer CentreLondon Health Sciences CentreQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBortezomibInternal medicineRituximabWaldenstrom macroglobulinemiaGastroenterologyMacroglobulinemiaLenalidomideChlorambucilFludarabineCladribineThalidomideMultiple myelomaRegimenLymphoplasmacytic LymphomaChemotherapyLymphomaCyclophosphamide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: WM is a clonal disorder of lymphoplasmacytoid cells that shares features with lymphoma and myeloma. It is generally considered an indolent lymphoma hence traditional first-line treatments include single-agent alkylators (RR 50–80%) or purine analogues (RR 70–80%). For relapsed/refractory disease, purine analogues lead to responses in only 30% of pts. Newer agents such as rituximab or thalidomide have moderate activity. Regardless of regimen, responses tend to be partial and transient. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has shown activity in myeloma. Objective responses were reported in phase I studies of lymphoma, including WM, making this agent of interest to evaluate. Methods: Eligible pts for this ongoing multicentre study must have symptomatic WM (Hb <110g/L; symptomatic lymphadenopathy; hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly; or hyperviscosity) and received <3 prior chemotherapy regimens (rituximab allowed as a 3rd regimen). Pts receive bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV bolus twice weekly x 2 wks on a 3 wk cycle until PD or 2 cycles beyond CR/stable PR. Planned accrual = 25 pts. Results: Sixteen pts are enrolled thus far. Demographics: median age 63 (range 46–87), M:F ratio = 9:7, ECOG 0:1:2 ratio = 5:10:1. Eight of 16 pts were chemonaive; 8 previously treated (prior regimens: chlorambucil, cladribine, fludarabine, CHOP). At study entry, most pts (12/16) had IgM levels >30g/L (range 11.2–79.8), measurable nodal disease (10/16 pts), and Hb levels <110g/L (10/16 pts). Responses have been observed: 3 confirmed PR (≥50% decrease in both IgM and bidimensional disease), 10 SD, no CR (of 13 evaluable pts). PR in 3 pts was reached after 3, 4, and 8 cycles, respectively. No pts have progressed on treatment. A ≥50% decrease in IgM alone with lagging nodal responses has been observed in another 3 pts. Therefore, a total of 6/13 pts (46%) have achieved PR based on paraprotein response alone. Hematologic improvements (Hb increases ≥ 10g/L) were observed in 9/13 pts (69%). Most common toxicities: fatigue (69%), sensory neuropathy (61.5%), headache (54%), myalgias (61.5%). Neuropathy is described as tingling, numbness, or pain in feet/legs generally within 2–4 cycles. Gr 3 neuropathy developed in 4 pts (none had clinical neuropathy at baseline). Four pts were removed from study due to neuropathy. Reversibility of neuropathy is pending longer followup. Other Gr 3 toxicities: thrombocytopenia (3/13), myalgias (2/13), neutropenia (2/13). Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were transient, mandating a dose reduction in only 1 pt (neutropenia). Gr 3 myalgias (leg cramps) led to drug discontinuation in 1 pt with rapid resolution. No Gr 4 toxicities have been reported. Conclusions: Bortezomib appears to have activity in WM with objective responses in 3 of 13 pts and SD in 10 additional pts evaluable thus far. Despite prompt IgM reductions and hematologic improvements, objective responses are slow due to lags in nodal reductions. Bortezomib is well-tolerated although sensory neuropathy is common. These interim results are promising and encourage further study of this drug in WM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207