MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587077594 · doi:10.4000/assr.27839

Le sacrifice comme mode de construction

2016· article· fr· W2587077594 on OpenAlexaff
Agnieszka Kedzierska-Manzon

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives de sciences sociales des religions · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En pays mandé (Mali, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinée), l’usage de certains artefacts matériels pour influer sur le destin collectif et individuel est très répandu. De taille et forme variées, ces artefacts fonctionnent comme des sujets dotés d’une capacité d’action dans l’expérience de leurs partenaires humains qui leur adressent la parole et les sacrifices sanglants. Contrairement à l’interprétation classique de tels sacrifices comme mode de communication avec l’invisible, l’analyse des « affordances » du sang mobilisées dans leur cadre révèle qu’ils s’apparentent davantage à un mode de construction. En raison de son caractère polymorphe tant sur le plan de la consistance que celui de la couleur, le sang sacrificiel, versé sur ces dieux toujours en devenir que sont les fétiches, joue un rôle essentiel dans leur constitution et leur conceptualisation, permettant de les façonner de manière sans cesse renouvelée. Offrant aux humains nécessiteux un interlocuteur à jamais inachevé mais à vocation de persister, le sacrifice ouvre ainsi la porte au changement continu et aux négociations permanentes des rapports sociaux existants de même qu’à la création des nouveaux arrangements dans un univers perpétuellement en mutation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.055
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives de sciences sociales des religionsSame topicAfrican Studies and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207