The Alamoutala Carbonate-Hosted Gold Deposit, Kédougou-Kénieba Inlier, West Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Alamoutala gold deposit is located in the Kédougou-Kénieba inlier, a window of Paleoproterozoic rocks that crop out in eastern Senegal and western Mali. The deposit is part of the ∼3-Moz Au Yatela district and produced 308,400 oz Au between 2002 and 2012. Country rocks in the Alamoutala open pit consist of carbonate rocks, arenites, wackes, and siltstones. The sedimentary rocks have been subjected to polycyclic deformation and regional greenschist-facies metamorphism. Synkinematic, calc-alkaline, intermediate quartz-feldspar porphyry stocks intruded the metasedimentary rocks at 2083 ± 7 Ma (U-Pb zircon). Amphibolite-facies contact metamorphism of carbonate rocks resulted in the formation of a high-temperature-low-pressure magnetitebearing skarn. Field relationships and microtextural data, however, indicate that economic gold mineralization is shear hosted and occurred during retrograde contact metamorphism. Geometric and kinematic analyses indicate that the ore-hosting structures were undergoing sinistral-reverse displacement at the time of mineralization. Ore minerals deposited synchronous with a potassic hydrothermal alteration assemblage defined as biotite + calcite + pyrite ± K-feldspar, actinolite-tremolite, quartz, muscovite, and tourmaline. Petrographic studies reveal that ore-related sulfides largely consist of pyrite with lesser pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite. The ore also contains accessory Ag-Sb-As-Hg-Bi-Te-Mo-W-Zn-Pb-Ni-Co-U-bearing mineral species. The Alamoutala deposit represents two distinct hydrothermal systems in which a locally developed magnetite-bearing skarn was overprinted by a region-wide orogenic gold event in the late Eburnean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".