Motor Unit Potential Jitter: A New Measure of Neuromuscular Transmission Instability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new measure of neuromuscular transmission instability, motor unit potential (MUP) jitter, is introduced. MUP jitter can be estimated quickly using MUP trains (MUPTs) extracted from electromyographic (EMG) signals acquired using conventional clinical equipment and needle EMG electrodiagnostic protocols. The primary motivation for developing MUP jitter is to avoid the technical demands associated with estimating jitter using conventional single fiber EMG techniques. At the core of the MUP jitter measure is a classifier capable of labeling a set of aligned MUP segments as single fiber MUP segments, i.e., parts of MUPs generated predominantly by a single fiber and not significantly contaminated by contributions from other fibers. For a set of MUPs generated by the same MU, these segments will have varying occurrence times within the MUPs, but will have consistent morphology across the MUPs. Pairs of sets of single fiber MUP segments generated by different fibers of the same MU and tracked across a MUPT can be used to estimate neuromuscular transmission instability. Aligning MUP segments is achieved using dynamic time warping. Results based on 680 simulated MUPTs show that MUP jitter can be estimated with an average error rate as low as 8.9%. Also, one or more sets of single fiber MUP segments can be detected in 85.3% of the studied trains. The analysis for a single MUPT can be completed in 3.6 s on average using a conventional personal computer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".