OP035 Efficacy and safety of abrilumab (AMG 181/MEDI 7183) therapy for moderate to severe Crohn's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Adhesion molecule α4β7 is a validated treatment target in inflammatory bowel diseases. We evaluated abrilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against α4β7, in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). Methods: This phase 2b, randomised, multi-centre, double-blind, placebo (Pbo)-controlled study enrolled patients aged 18–65 years with moderate to severe CD (CDAI score 220–450) and evidence of active inflammation (by endoscopic evaluation, or elevated C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin). In addition, patients must have had inadequate or loss of response or intolerance to immunosuppressives, TNF antagonists, or corticosteroids. Eligible patients were randomised to receive Pbo or abrilumab (21 or 70 mg) SC on day 1, weeks 2 and 4, and every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 24 weeks, or one dose of abrilumab 210 mg SC on day 1. The primary endpoint was CDAI remission (score <150) at week 8. Key secondary endpoints were remission at week 12 and CDAI response (reduction from baseline of ≥100) at weeks 8 and 12. CD4+ T cell subsets were enumerated and α4β7 receptor occupancy was measured in a subgroup of patients. Results: This study enrolled 249 patients. Final randomisation allocation was affected by a systematic misalignment in investigational product, resulting in 98, 26, 84, and 41 patients in the Pbo, 21 mg Q4W, 70 mg Q4W, and 210 mg treatment groups, respectively. The study blind and randomisation were intact. Baseline demographics were similar. Statistically significant improvement was not achieved between the abrilumab 70 mg Q4W and Pbo arms for the primary endpoint (p=0.76 vs Pbo) (Table). However, higher rates of remission and response were observed in the active treatment arms at week 12, particularly in patients with prior failure of TNF antagonists assigned to the 210 mg abrilumab group. Maximal reduction of free α4β7 on naïve CD4+ T cells in the peripheral blood was sustained from the first measurement at week 2 to week 8 for all dose groups, and through week 12 for the 21 mg Q4W and 70 mg Q4W groups. Abrilumab induced a significant post-dose increase in α4β7-high central memory CD4+ T cell counts between baseline and week 8. Adverse events were similar among treatment groups through week 24, with no cases of PML or deaths. No patients developed neutralizing antibodies to abrilumab. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not met, beneficial effects of abrilumab were observed for remission and response rates. There was no safety imbalance compared with Pbo. Amgen and AstraZeneca/MedImmune sponsored this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".