MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587172617

Intersectionality at Work: Young Women Organizers' Participation in Labour Youth Programs in Canada

2016· article· en· W2587172617 on OpenAlex
Jan Kainer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersectionalitySociologyGender studiesYouth studiesPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada in the 1990s the labour movement expressed deep concern about widespread union density decline and aging memberships in trade unions (Gomez, Gunderson and Meltz, 2002; Jackson, 2005; Lowe and Rastin, 2000; Tannock and Flocks, 2002). In response to growing anxiety about the scarcity of young unionists for the future strength of organized labour, the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the country's central labour body, adopted a resolution at its 1996 Convention directing its affiliate unions to reach out to youth and to make youth organizing a priority. (1) This paper analyzes the experiences of a diverse group of women labour activists participating in youth programs in English Canada. Focusing specifically on the multiple identities of the young women activists, consideration is given to how their age, gender and racialized identities affected their participation in youth programs in the Canadian labour movement. I argue that the intersectional identities of the women placed them on the margins of labour organizations, which shaped their response to the established practices of labour bodies, and created systemic disadvantages in their organizing role. This case study of youth organizers draws on Joan Acker's inequality regimes perspective (2006, 2006a), an approach to conceptualizing intersectional inequality in organizations. The paper also follows the work of Geraldine Healy, Keywords: young women, union organizing, organized labour Canada, youth internships. Harriet Bradley, and Cynthia Forson (2011) who apply Acker's framework to their study of minority women in the U.K. public sector (see also Holgate et al., 2006). Acker argues thatthebasesof inequality in work organizations are grounded in class, gender and racial hierarchies that mirror social inequalities within the wider society. Organizational class hierarchies reflect historically constructed gendered and racializednormative systems thatprivilege whitemasculine values--an ongoing effect of the historical development of capitalism in which white males dominated (and continue to dominate) the most powerful and largest bureaucratic organizations. Organizational practices and processes in work organizations, Acker contends, operate in the interests of the dominant white male power hierarchies leading to inequality regimes that disadvantage gendered, racialized, and other workers with different social identities. Intersectional identity multiplies and complicates disadvantages faced by workers. Acker argues that inequality regimes are made visible in situations where organizations initiate change efforts (e.g., affirmative action). This study of youth outreach programs represents a change effort by organized labour and helps to illustrate the processes creating barriers to equality. Following Acker's framework, the analysis of young women organizers presented here uncovers the complex and multifaceted inequality regime dynamics that sustain gender, race, and age power differentials within Canadian labour movement organizations. The paper begins with a discussion of the methodology followed by a concise overview of youth programs in the Canadian labour movement Next is a brief review of feminist approaches to theorizing and applying intersectionality to empirical studies, with specific focus on Acker's inequality regimes perspective. A detailed analysis of the case study findings is then presented, including discussion and a brief conclusion. Methodology Fourteen young women organizers working in unions and labour federations in English Canada were interviewed. Women were selected because they are a recognized equity group and because their experiences as labour organizers are relatively unknown in Canada. Following the snowball method, a few organizers were contacted first by the author and these respondents offered additional names of young women to interview. The respondents were asked questions concerning: their age; family, class, educational, and labour background; how they became involved in labour organizing; and, details about their particular organizing experiences. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it