MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587226214 · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2016.7848906

Faster-than-Nyquist Single-Carrier MIMO Signaling

2016· article· en· W2587226214 on OpenAlexaff
Michael McGuire, Alexandros Dimopoulos, Mihai Sima

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)Nyquist–Shannon sampling theoremPhase-shift keyingElectronic engineeringNyquist rateBit error rateAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)Control theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsEngineeringSampling (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faster-Than-Nyquist (FTN) signaling is created when a digital communications signal has an occupied bandwidth less than the symbol rate. It has been previously demonstrated that FTN signals can achieve bit error rates near that of full-bandwidth signaling for BPSK and 4-QPSK modulation. Iterative frequency domain equalization allows for low cost receivers. This paper presents FTN signaling for Multiple-Input/Multiple-Output (MIMO) signals where a Single-Carrier (SC) MIMO signal is converted to the frequency domain and its occupied bandwidth is reduced by removing some of the frequency components before conversion back to the time domain. A previously proposed Single-Input/Single-Output FTN iterative receiver algorithm is extended for FTN SC-MIMO signals. Singular Value Decompositions (SVD) are proactively performed on the channel transfer matrices to reduce the computation cost of the iterative receiver. It is demonstrated that the Bit Error Rate (BER) performance of this MIMO FTN scheme is near that of full bandwidth MIMO signals with a low cost receiver algorithm. The signalling is robust to the selection of the frequency components that are nulled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207