MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587240777

How stories are lived in the Sunlight Room

2016· article· en· W2587240777 on OpenAlexaff
Tahmina Shayan

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Digital Technology
Canadian institutionsCapilano University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSunlightToddlerVisual artsPsychologyArtDevelopmental psychologyPhysicsOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The word "story" mean much more than a story from a book.This inquiry is based on how the word "story" is lived among a group of infants and toddlers.The aim of this inquiry is not only to find out the stories of children, but also to inquire how stories are lived in the Sunlight Room.The Sunlight Room is a branch of one of the early childhood centers, which has an infant toddler program.The inquiry was carried out through close observation of the room and the children during a relatively long span of time.Videos and photos were the main tools to capture what was being observed.The inquiry demonstrated that everything is a story in the Sunlight Room and everyone in the room has a story.Also the stories that start in the Sunlight Room, can continue outside it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)Same topicChild Development and Digital TechnologyFrench-language works237,207