MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587246515 · doi:10.2118/182626-ms

A Comprehensive Geochemical-Based Approach at Modeling and Interpreting Brine Dilution in Carbonate Reservoirs

2017· article· en· W2587246515 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Simulation Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company
KeywordsDilutionCarbonateBrineEnhanced oil recoveryChemistryRelative permeabilityThermodynamicsSorptionWettingMineralogyPetroleum engineeringGeologyPorosityAdsorptionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It has been amply proven through laboratory studies, affirmed by a few field trials, that dilution of brine injected has a potent impact on improving oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs. However, debate still exists as to the mechanisms responsible for such impact. The widely acknowledged underlying mechanism is the wettability alteration, achieved through a combination of lower ionic strength, multi-ion exchange, surface charge and mineral alteration. Therefore, the motive behind this study is to develop a model that can further support and interpret the brine dilution approach in the framework of carbonate reservoirs. In this paper, we formulated a theory for the observed behavior that coupled equations of multi-component transport and geochemical reactions. The geochemical system considered a choice of significant ions and minerals, relevant to the published experiments. Mechanisms included in the model were dispersion/diffusion, instantaneous equilibrium reactions in terms of intra-aqueous and sorption reactions, and non-equilibrium rate controlled kinetic reactions-mineral alteration. The equivalent modification in wettability was represented by interpolating through a set of flow functions, particularly the relative permeability characteristics. The model was employed to interpret recently published experimental data on carbonate core plugs (Austad et al. (2011); Yousef et al. (2011); Yi and Sarma (2012); Chandrasekhar and Mohanty (2013)) where systematic dilutions of injectate against the initial formation brine were analyzed. Considering known values of injection rate, thermodynamic equilibrium constants, and reaction rate constants, the model was able to capture the trend of the experimental oil recovery and effluent ion concentrations. Thus, the model could help interpret the observed behavior as a sequel to an interplay between surface charge and mineral alteration. The trend typically reflected a speedy transient period at early times, trailed by relaxed transient period and finally reaching a steady state solution. The model was used to closely examine the dominant chemical mechanism responsible for improved oil mobilization relating to brine dilution during smart waterflooding. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms at play during any recovery process is crucial for its successful implementation as well as reliable production modeling, forecasting and optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it