MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587268859 · doi:10.1109/tcst.2017.2654420

Physics-Based 3-D Control-Oriented Modeling of Floating Wind Turbines

2017· article· en· W2587268859 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeffrey R. Homer, Ryozo Nagamune

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWave and Wind Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Renewable Energy LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitute for Computing, Information and Cognitive Systems
KeywordsDrivetrainTurbineTorqueOffshore wind powerWind powerMarine engineeringSoftwareEngineeringControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)Aerospace engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a physics-based control-oriented model for general floating offshore wind turbines that contains as many as six platform degrees of freedom (DOFs) and two drivetrain DOFs. The model is derived from the first principles, and therefore, can be manipulated by its real physical parameters while maintaining accuracy across the highly nonlinear operating range of floating wind turbine systems (WTSs). Forces and torques generated by wind and wave disturbances are derived for a baseline 5-MW wind turbine on a semisubmersible platform. The proposed model is validated against advanced simulation software FAST, and shown to be accurate at predicting major dynamics of the floating WTS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems TechnologySame topicWave and Wind Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207