Les possibles de l’amour décolonial : relations, transmissions et silences dans Kuessipan de Naomi Fontaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se penche sur les divers types de relations dans le roman Kuessipan de l’auteure innue Naomi Fontaine qui sont chargées d’amour décolonial. Ce concept, que Huberman établit à partir de Leanne Simpson, Junot Díaz et Chela Sandoval, envisage l’amour comme un outil de transformation politique, capable de libérer le sujet opprimé et de générer des possibilités pour un mode d’existence décolonisé. Dans le roman poétique de Fontaine, les relations de parenté, de langue, de transmission du savoir et celles qu’on retrouve dans la pratique littéraire elle-même sont des moyens pour explorer et reconstruire l’acceptation, l’intimité, la connexion et l’amour. 
 
 This article examines how various forms of relationships in Innu author Naomi Fontaine’s novel Kuessipan are laden with instances of decolonial love. This concept, which Huberman grounds in the interpretations of Leanne Simpson, Junot Díaz and Chela Sandoval, formulates love as a tool for political change, capable of liberating the oppressed subject and of generating possibilities for a decolonized mode of existence. In Fontaine’s poetic novel, relationships of kinship, language, transmission of knowledge and those found in the literary practice itself are ways to explore and rebuild acceptance, intimacy, connection and love.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".