MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587345489

WISDOM EDUCATION IN SOCIAL CONTEXT – DISCUSSING THE SOCIAL ROOTS OF THE CHINESE WISDOM

2018· article· en· W2587345489 on OpenAlex
Wen Ma

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Educational Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIdeological and Political Education
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRighteousnessLoyaltyHonestyInterpretation (philosophy)ChinaFilial pietyCivilizationShameChinese cultureContext (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)SociologyEnvironmental ethicsPsychologyEpistemologySocial psychologyPhilosophyGender studiesPolitical scienceHistoryTheologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the history of human progress, China’s traditional culture has left us a splendid civilization and numerous wise and preeminent individuals who have made a great impact on the development of human history. In this paper, I provide a novel interpretation of China’s traditional culture from the perspective of eight moral principals of “wisdom, honesty, loyalty, filial piety, rites, righteousness, purity and shame”. It is my aim that this educational study will help educational researchers develop a correct way of thinking to approach the essence of Chinese traditional culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.444 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it