Sade sous le manteau : l’image du sadisme de Stendhal à Huysmans, entre mythe et figuration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse les représentations littéraires du sadisme dans le cadre du XIXe siècle français. Si un héritage sadien se consolide dans la tradition littéraire de ce siècle, il n’en demeure pas moins que l’influence de Sade s’ancre souvent dans des textes qui omettent de mentionner son nom. C’est le cas de la nouvelle « Les Cenci », publiée par Stendhal en 1837. Dans Là-bas (1891), Huysmans, quant à lui, met en scène un protagoniste rédigeant l’histoire de Gilles de Rais. Contrairement au texte de Stendhal, qui sollicite l’aura du mythe afin de susciter l’intérêt du lecteur, Huysmans se positionne de manière critique par rapport aux conditions de formation du mythe. L’article retrace ainsi l’évolution générale que connaît la figure historique de Sade à travers le XIXe siècle, au sens où cette évolution est caractérisée par une mise à l’écart progressive des déformations mythologiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".