MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587419261 · doi:10.2118/184961-ms

Insulated Coiled Tubing as a Tool for a Thermal EOR Process Through Non-thermal Well

2017· article· en· W2587419261 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Damour, Darren Johannson

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoiled tubingPetroleum engineeringOil wellDrawdown (hydrology)ThermalThermal conductionEnhanced oil recoveryThermal fluidsPressure dropMaterials scienceMechanicsHeat transferGeologyGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialThermal resistanceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A thermally insulated coiled tubing is permanently inserted in a horizontal heavy oil producer well and used to circulate hot oil (or water) in the well to heat by conduction the vicinity of the liner, where the drawdown is the most important. This process can be used in non-thermal wells and improves heavy oil field production with a limited quantity of energy. This paper presents the typical completion applied for this EOR process, the well integrity concerns due to high temperature and the calculated oil production increase that is confirmed by field application. The insulated coiled tubing is inserted into the horizontal well up to the well-toe. The production tubing is installed parallel to the insulated coiled tubing. The process is pumping hot oil at 230°C (or water) through the insulated coiled tubing. The heated oil is circulating from the well-toe back to the well-heel in the liner and heat the reservoir by conduction. This energy delivered to the reservoir will reduce the oil viscosity within a few meters from the liner and allow lower pressure drop. A transient thermal model has been developed to model this EOR process. The equations on which the model has been built are Darcy's law, the continuity of the flow and the energy balance. Some assumptions were taken to simplify the model such as constant reservoir properties over space and time. The model provides the temperature along the liner with max temperature at the toe and min temperature at the heel as well as the radial temperature in the reservoir. It models also the extra oil production allowed by the process. The temperature involved on the critical parts of the completion remain low and allow to apply this EOR on non-thermal wells. The field monitoring (temperature and net oil production) of the first pilots in Canada have confirmed the model results. The energy consumption requested is approx. 400kW, ten to twenty times lower than typical steam injection process. This process is not a competitor for steam injection but a good way to improve the production of heavy oil well with low CAPEX and low OPEX for specific fields where steam injection is not efficient like fields with thin reservoir. In this tough period for the oil industry, this technology can be applied on existing producer wells without drilling injector wells. The combination of this process with waterflooding is a win-win association. Waterflooding brings the driven mechanism to the reservoir and the thermal process allows better oil flow at the well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207