TPAHS: A Truthful and Profit Maximizing Double Auction for Heterogeneous Spectrums
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the auction has been widely applied in wireless communications for spectrum allocation, so that spectrum owners can lease their unutilized spectrum to secondary users. Both primary users and secondary users can get benefit from the auction. Moreover, the spectrum utilization is improved. Existing auction mechanisms either do not consider the heterogeneity of spectrums or pay little attention to the auction's economic efficiency. In this paper, we propose a Truthful and Profit maximizing double Auction for Heterogeneous Spectrums (TPAHS), which simultaneously considers spectrum heterogeneity and economic efficiency. Moreover, different from the most existing spectrum auction mechanisms which are based on interference graph, we consider a more realistic SINR (Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio) model. We prove that TPAHS is truthful, individual-rational, budget-balanced and the experiments show that TPAHS improves the auctioneer's profit significantly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".