MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587539738 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.8

Effect of thermocapillary stress on slip length for a channel textured with parallel ridges

2017· article· en· W2587539738 on OpenAlexafffund
Marc Hodes, Toby L. Kirk, Georgios Karamanis, Scott MacLachlan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaImperial College LondonNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSlip (aerodynamics)MechanicsAdiabatic processLaminar flowMaterials scienceSlip ratioAdiabatic wallBoundary value problemClassification of discontinuitiesSlippingConformal mapPhysicsGeometryThermodynamicsBoundary layerShear stress

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compute the apparent hydrodynamic slip length for (laminar and fully developed) Poiseuille flow of liquid through a heated parallel-plate channel. One side of the channel is textured with parallel (streamwise) ridges and the opposite one is smooth. On the textured side of the channel, the liquid is in the Cassie state. No-slip and constant heat flux boundary conditions are imposed at the solid–liquid interfaces along the tips of the ridges, and the menisci between ridges are considered to be flat and adiabatic. The smooth side of the channel is subjected to no-slip and adiabatic boundary conditions. We account for the streamwise and transverse thermocapillary stresses along menisci. When the latter is sufficiently small, Stokes flow may be assumed. Then, our solution is based upon a conformal map. When, additionally, the ratio of channel height to half of the ridge pitch is of order 1 or larger, an accurate but less cumbersome solution follows from a matched asymptotic expansion. When inertial effects are relevant, the slip length is numerically computed. Setting the thermocapillary stress equal to zero yields the slip length for an adiabatic flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207