Reconfiguring the Sick Girl in Young Adult Literature: Worlds Where We Might Belong
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconfiguring the Sick Girl in Young Adult Literature: Worlds Where We Might Belong Dunja Kovačević (bio) Avery, Lara. The Memory Book. Poppy, 2016. 355pp. $21.49 hc. ISBN 9780316283748. Garvin, Jeff. Symptoms of Being Human. Balzer + Bray, 2016. 335pp. $21.99 hc. ISBN 9780062382863. Kletter, Kerry. The First Time She Drowned. Philomel Books, 2016. 352pp. $17.99 hc. ISBN 9780399171031. Reichardt, Marisa. Underwater. Farrar Straus Giroux, 2016. 279pp. $17.99 hc. ISBN 9780374368869. Smith, Amber. The Way I Used to Be. Margaret K. McElderry Books, 2016. 367pp. $23.99 hc. ISBN 9781481449359. The YA novels under review in this essay focus on characters pathologized or socially constructed as “sick” or genderqueer. The importance of these texts in the constantly evolving landscape of YA literature is that they help to challenge assumptions about who is entitled to and deserving of a fully fleshed-out subjectivity. The protagonists in these texts grapple with the question of their survival in worlds generally poorly equipped to protect or help them, and, with one exception, they survive. In Amber Smith’s The Way I Used to Be, Eden is raped by her older brother’s best friend in her home during freshman year; Jeff Garvin’s Riley Cavanaugh struggles to embody their gender-fluid identity under the microscope of their father’s political career in Symptoms of Being Human; Marisa Reichardt breathes life into Morgan Grant, a survivor of a school shooting whose trauma confines her to the safety of her apartment in Underwater; Kerry Kletter’s Cassie O’Malley is newly independent after spending years at a psychiatric institution at the behest of her mother in The First Time She Drowned; and finally, in Lara Avery’s The Memory Book, Sammie McCoy fights a terminal diagnosis. Moreover, the protagonists of these novels are the facilitators of their own radical survival—however temporary—empowering themselves to heal wounds wrought by trauma through embodied action and process. [End Page 159] The “Sick Girl” in Literature In 1998, I wrote in a journal every day: banal accounts of schoolyard marriages and daily skirmishes with antagonistic girls who bid me “go back to where you came from”; ruminations on the broader strokes of becoming a Canadian citizen, made important by a congratulatory card from my favourite teacher; and secondhand stories about people and places belonging to a different landscape that had by that time mostly receded from my memory. I also wrote about other things, details I was only just beginning to find words to articulate—the way my father had to relearn to smile after sending my grandparents back overseas, how the competing pressures of family and friends made me dream of fading away. Stress fractures were forming in the too-tight window of my childhood innocence and in the American dream narrative it engendered, so I retreated into distant worlds—the diaries of Anne Frank, Harlequin romances my mother hid at the back of a closet in the basement, encyclopaedias—praying that each upcoming page would sketch a world I recognized and into which I could project myself. I would not gain access to worlds like my own—filled with trauma, chronic illness, dislocation—until much later, and I would not recognize this lack as one of representation until later still. Scholar-artist Johann Hedva, in her project Sick Woman Theory, names this pain created through lack, “the trauma of not being seen,” which becomes a characteristic central to her “sick woman,” in turn an extension of Instagram artist Audrey Wollen’s “sad girl, when, if, she grows up.”1 Wollen developed Sad Girl Theory as a way of rethinking and re-historicizing the sadness of girls as a site of resistance and a response to repressive patriarchy. She says, “Basically, girls being sad has been categorized as this act of passivity, and therefore, discounted from the history of activism” (qtd. in Tunnicliffe). Hedva’s sick woman figure arises out of a desire to render visible those of us who possess “traditionally anti-heroic qualities—namely illness, idleness, and inaction” and to present them as “capable of being the symbol of a grand Theory.” The project of simply placing at the centre (and before that...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".