Bending and growth of entrained air filament under converging and asymmetric rotational fields
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here we have proposed the increase of the entrainment rate by extruding an air filament under the action of convergent but asymmetric rotational field. By varying the source speed and the diameter of rotational fields, we showed the bending of an air filament towards the higher strength direction of the asymmetric inertia. Interfacial profiles like bubble ejection from the air filament and non-collapsible entrainment with air accumulation in a stagnant zone are obtained in finite volume based numerical simulations, on gradual increase of average rotational fields. Physical understanding of bent interface profile reveals the presence of multiple stages in filament growth depending upon the inertia of surrounding medium. Accumulation of air in the stagnant zone is found to be more prominent in case of rotational speed based asymmetry in contrast to its counterpart having diametric asymmetry of imposing sources. Relative comparison between these two methods of producing asymmetric field showed faster growth of filament upon varying the source diameter, while keeping the speed same. In case of extreme retardation and enhancement of rotational asymmetry, film pinch off and formation of bubble train have been reported. The shape of ejected bubbles is governed by the inertia of the surrounding medium, and bubbles have taken elliptical shapes with their major axis aligned parallel to the adjacent velocity field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it