MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587635100 · doi:10.2118/182652-ms

Model Order Reduction and Control Polynomial Approximation for Well-Control Production Optimization

2017· article· en· W2587635100 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Simulation Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCMG Reservoir Simulation Foundation
KeywordsMathematical optimizationParametrization (atmospheric modeling)MathematicsApplied mathematicsModel order reductionPolynomialInterpolation (computer graphics)Computer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective of this paper is to reduce the computational effort in reservoir flooding optimization problems by a combination of different optimization parametrization methods and model order reduction techniques. We compare three different parametrization methods that reduce the cardinality of the original infinite set of control-decision variables to a finite set. The three methods include a traditional piece-wise constant (PWC) approximation, a polynomial approximation by Chebyshev orthogonal polynomials and a piece-wise polynomial approximation by cubic Spline interpolation. The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition with Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method (POD-DEIM) accomplishes the reduced order modeling (ROM).. We compare a gradient-free global stochastic search approach and a gradient-based local search approach. We used Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) as a gradient-free algorithm and Interior-Point Optimization (IPOPT) with L-BFGS method as a gradient-based algorithm. First, we compare the performances of the three parametrization methods solved by each optimizer, using fine scale simulations for an increasing level of parametrization refinement. Then, in the second part of this paper, we combine the parametrization methods with the reduced modeling workflow. For a given level of parametrization refinement, we compare the performance of each parametrization method coupled with POD-DEIM, and solved by each optimizer. In this part, we introduce an online training procedure, where the first optimization iteration is used to construct the snapshot matrix. The results demonstrate how refining the control approximation with more decision variables per well lead to better NPV values, but with a higher computational cost. The best NPV was achieved using the highest refining level with Chebyshev polynomial approximation. Both polynomial and piece-wise polynomial approximations served as better training sets for POD-DEIM leading to a more accurate and fast reduced model. With the strategy proposed, POD-DEIM showed the best optimization accuracy for Chebyshev polynomial with the gradient-free optimizer, thus permitting the use of the model reduction methodology for global-stochastic search methods. However, the gradient-based approach seems to consistently outperform the gradient-free approach in terms of NPV and number of iterations for the cases shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it