MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587647404 · doi:10.4000/ifha.8648

Sławomir Moździoch, Stanisław Rosik, Thomas Wünsch (dir.), Forschungen zur Geschichte Schlesiens. Methoden und Praxis der Historiographie und neue Untersuchungen

2017· article· de· W2587647404 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Rossignol

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2017
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPraxisPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce volume est le deuxième d’une série dédiée à l’histoire et à l’historiographie de la Silésie. Il comprend des articles rédigés en allemand et en polonais avec, pour chaque contribution, un résumé dans l’autre langue. Les articles comprennent des réflexions sur la méthodologie historique, sur la terminologie utilisée par les historiens et sur les approches historiographiques pour étudier une région dont la recherche historique, en raison de son histoire même, est particulièrement compliquée,...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207