MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587695879 · doi:10.1088/1361-6471/aa5f28

Study of bound states in<sup>10</sup>Be by one neutron removal reactions of<sup>11</sup>Be

2017· article· en· W2587695879 on OpenAlexaff
Jacob Johansen, V. Bildstein, M. J. G. Borge, M. Cubero, J. Diriken, J. Elseviers, L. M. Fraile, H. O. U. Fynbo, L. P. Gaffney, R. Gernhäuser, B. Jonson, G. T. Koldste, J. Konki, T. Kröll, R. Krücken, D. Mücher, T. Nilsson, K. Nowak, J. Pakarinen, V. Pesudo, R. Raabe, K. Riisager, M. Seidlitz, O. Tengblad, H. Törnqvist, D. Voulot, N. Warr, K. Wimmer, H. De Witte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphTRIUMF
FundersSeventh Framework ProgrammeMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónKU LeuvenFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeDanmarks Frie ForskningsfondBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungHort InnovationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilVlaamse regeringEuropean Commission
KeywordsNeutronProtonDeuteriumExcited stateAtomic physicsNuclear reactionGround statePhysicsBeam (structure)Nuclear physicsPopulationBound stateChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bound states of (10)Be have been studied by removing single neutrons from $^{11}Be$ nuclei. A 2.8 MeV $u^{–1}$ beam of $^{11}Be$was produced at ISOLDE, CERN and directed on to both proton and deuteron targets inducing one-neutron removal reactions. Charged particles were detected to identify the two reaction channels (d, t) and (p, d), and the individual states in (10)Be were identified by gamma detection. All bound states but one were populated and identified in the (d, t) reaction. The combination of REX-ISOLDE and MINIBALL allowed for a clean separation of the high-lying states in $^{10}Be$. This is the first time these states have been separated in a reaction experiment. Differential cross sections have been calculated for all the reaction channels and compared to DWBA calculations. Spectroscopic factors are derived and compared to values from the litterature. While the overall agreement between the spectrocopic factors is poor, the ratio between the ground state and the first excited state is in agreement with the previous measured ones. Furthermore, a significant population of the ${2}_{2}^{+}$ state is observed, which which may indicate the presence of multi-step processes at our beam energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle PhysicsSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207