Музыкальная культура тептярей Урало-Поволжского региона России
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents an analysis of the musical culture of the Teptyars – one of the presently extinct ethnicities of the region from the Urals to the Volga. First mention of them appeared in 1631 as an ethnic-class group on the territory of Bashkortostan. During Russia’s war with Napoleon Bonaparte in 1812 Teptyar regiments comprised part of the Cossacks’ Army Division led by ataman M.I. Platov. In 1926 during the population census in the USSR there were 27.300 Teptyars registered, although subsequently they were listed as Tatars or Bashkirs. The main source for the article was the analysis of the auditory recordings made by Russian ethnographer Sergei Rybakov, published in his work “Muzyka i pesni uralskikh musulman” [“Music and Songs by Muslims from the Ural Mountains”] (1897) of eight Teptyar songs of the Teptyar-Uchalinsk Volost (presently, the Uchalin District in Bashkortostan). In the “Present-Day Notation” section of the book a number of instrumental melodies, written down by the author of the article in 1984 in the regions densely populated by the Teptyars (the Uchalinsk and Chekmagushevsk Districts). It also presents present-day Teptyar tunes on the bayan and single-low button accordion. Upon analysis of the surviving specimens of the Teptyar musical culture, one can discern original traits of intonation-based material, bearing a fusion of Tatar, Bashkir, Russian and Mari rhythmical-melodic formulas, albeit possessing its own characteristic distinctions. The conclusion is arrived at that during the first quarter of the 20th century a “conservation” of Teptyar musical culture took place, an overcoming of which can be discerned at the present time. Keywords: folk music of the peoples of Russia, the musical culture of the Teptyars
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.185 | 0.074 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".