MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587710698 · doi:10.1149/2.021706jss

LiF Doping of C<sub>60</sub>Studied with X-ray Photoemission Shake-Up Analysis

2017· article· en· W2587710698 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFullerene Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaMcMaster University
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMaterials scienceFullereneX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyDissociation (chemistry)DopingPhotoemission spectroscopyAtomic physicsCovalent bondChemical physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistryOptoelectronicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report our investigation of the chemical doping mechanism induced by LiF interaction with fullerene thin films. High resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the C1s shake-up satellites and F1s main core level, supported by density functional calculations, suggest the formation of a charge transfer complex between covalent LiF monomers and dimers and C60. This interaction was observed in both LiF/C60 and C60/LiF depositions, suggesting that some charge transfer complexation can occur in these systems even without dissociation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it