Acquired Hemophilia: A Ten Year Population-Based Review of Incidence Rate, Patient Demographics, and Treatment Outcomes in Manitoba, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disease characterized by inhibitory autoantibodies to coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Although this entity is well described clinically, there are few population-based data available to allow accurate estimates of incidence or outcomes. The reported incidence is approximately 1.48/million/year.Up to 50% of cases of AHA may be associated with a variety of clinical conditions. Treatment typically involves immunosuppression to eradicate the FVIII inhibitor, as well as hemostatic therapy to control bleeding. Methods: We identified all unique cases of AHA in Manitoba, Canada between April 2006 and November 2015 from the records of the provincial reference hemostasis laboratory at the Health Sciences Center in Winnipeg. Since 2006, this laboratory has provided testing for the province's entire population. AHA was defined by a positive Bethesda inhibitor assay titre (> 0.5 B.U); patients with congenital hemophilia were excluded. The diagnosis was confirmed through chart review of medical records from CancerCare Manitoba (the sole provider of tertiary out-patient hematology care in Manitoba, and site of the Manitoba Bleeding Disorders Program), as well as from hospital admission records. We used a piloted case report form to gather patient and clinical demographics such as age, sex, and comorbidities; coagulation factor and inhibitor levels, pharmacotherapeutic treatments, blood product administration, adverse events, clinical outcomes, and survival. Results: 23 new cases of AHA were identified between 1 April 2006 and 1 November 2015, corresponding to an incidence rate for the Manitoba population of 1.98 cases per million per year. The median age at diagnosis was 75 years (range 49 to 88 years). The male to female ratio was 0.92:1. 22% (n=5) of patients had an underlying condition associated with AHA: 4 had autoimmune disease, 1had an active malignancy. Most patients initially presented to an emergency department (78%, n=18), with 70% of patients (n=16) requiring hospital admission. All patients had bleeding symptoms at the time of diagnosis. 57% (n=13) had a major bleed at the time of diagnosis, defined as a decrease in hemoglobin of ≥ 20 g/L from baseline or requiring transfusion of at least two units of red blood cells in 24 hours. Combined cyclophosphamide and prednisone was the most common immunosuppressive regimen used to eradicate the FVIII inhibitor (n = 18); two of these patients also received IVIG as part of their first line therapy. One patient was treated with prednisone alone due to concurrent esophageal adenocarcinoma, and plans for future chemotherapy. Three patients were not treated due to palliation, death prior to treatment initiation, and active tuberculosis. Data regarding immunosuppressive treatment is unknown in one patient. Activated recombinant factor VII was the most common first line hemostatic agent used (43%, n = 10). 13% of patients (n=3) were treated initially with tranexamic acid because AHA had not yet been recognized as the cause of bleeding. Adverse reactions to treatment occurred in almost all patients; the most common being mood disturbance and leukopenia. The median time to remission (Bethesda titre <0.5 B.U and/or normal FVIII level) was 62 days (range 16-166 days). The median survival after diagnosis was less than 5 years. The cause of death was not available for the majority patients, but at least one patient died as a result of bleeding. Disease relapse was rare, occurring in only 2 patients. Conclusions: The incidence of AHA identified in Manitoba, Canada is 1.98/million/year, slightly higher than previous estimates. Only 21% of patients had an associated comorbidity, which is lower than previous estimates, and may reflect a bias in non-population based series. Major bleeding requiring multiple transfusions is common, as is the need for hemostatic therapy and hospitalization. Adverse events related to treatment are common. There is high mortality seen in patients with AHA. Patients who die early are likely to be undercounted in non-population based series. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".