MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587739182 · doi:10.1115/dscc2011-6131

Integrator Leakage for Limit Cycle Suppression in Servo Mechanisms With Stiction

2011· article· en· W2587739182 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStictionControl theory (sociology)Limit cyclePID controllerIntegratorLeakage (economics)Limit (mathematics)ServoComputer scienceController (irrigation)MathematicsControl engineeringPhysicsEngineeringMathematical analysisControl (management)Artificial intelligenceQuantum mechanicsTemperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports quantitative answers to two questions regarding the limit cycle behavior arising from the servo mechanisms with stiction under the positional PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) control. The first question is, how large the magnitude of the limit cycle is for a given value of stiction force. The second one is how we should modify the PID controller to avoid this limit cycle with minimal degradation in the serve performance. The main approach is based on understanding key algebraic properties of the state trajectory. As a result, a simple bisection algorithm has been devised to compute the exact magnitude of the periodic solution for a given value of stiction. A direct extension of this algorithm enables us to find the minimum value of the integrator leakage to avoid the limit cycle. A numerical example demonstrates the main results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207