MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2587742352 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx002.200

P074 Decreased levels of circulating protein S (PROS1) in patients with active Crohn's disease

2017· article· en· W2587742352 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alicia M. Sambuelli, Paula Chavero, Gabriela de Larrañaga, Andrea Emilse Errasti, A. Carrera Silva, Lisina Tessone, Silvia Negreira, Ángel Gil, Maricel I. Bellicoso, S Goncalves, Sergio P. Huernos, Pilar Martínez Tirado, Carla V. Rothlin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein SInternal medicineProtein S deficiencyMedicineImmunologyGastroenterologyCrohn's diseaseMERTKThrombosisReceptorDiseaseReceptor tyrosine kinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and CD are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. Plasma protein S (PROS1) is an anticoagulant that works as a cofactor for activated protein C. PROS1 deficiency increases the risk of thrombosis. Recent pathophysiological and experimental studies in animals showed that PROS1, expressed in T lymphocytes, is also an anti-inflammatory protein playing an inhibitory role in innate immunity due to its agonist activity on tyrosine kinase TAM receptors (TYRO3, AXL and MERTK), Rothlin et al. 2015, Carrera Silva et al. 2013. A decrease in plasma PROS1 could be related to activity or phenotype of human IBD. Aims: 1. To investigate whether there are differences between PROS1 levels in patients with CD and UC compared to healthy controls. 2. To study whether there is a relationship between PROS1 levels and IBD activity. Methods: Free PROS1 (immunoturburbimetry, Liatest, Stago, France) was determined in 86 IBD pts.: M 38, F 48 (UC: n 54, CD: n 32) and 30 healthy controls (M 18, F 12), mean ages 38.9±16.0, 40.4±15.0 and 38.2±12.2 respectively. IBD was classified by activity indexes: CDAI (active CD >150), Mayo score (active UC >2), and Montreal classification. Results: Mean PROS1 levels in CD (91.3±28.5) were significantly lower vs. controls (109.6±23.9, p=0.0077) and UC (104.0±28.2, p=0.048). In active CD (n 20, CDAI: 265.9±68.2) PROS1 levels (85.8±24.3) were significantly lower than in controls (p=0.0015), but vs. CD in remission (n 12: CDAI: 58.2±43.0) did not show significance (100.2±33.5). In active CD, the difference with controls was provided only from the moderate-severe subgroup (n17, CDAI 275.9±69.6, PROS1 84.2±26.0, p=0.0023) but not from other. PROS1 levels were lower in active CD vs. active UC as a trend p=0.082. In active UC (n 31) PROS1 levels (98.90±27.8) were not different from controls or UC in remission (n=23, PROS1 110.91±27.5). The extent of UC (11 proctitis vs. 43 left or extensive) did not show significant differences (116.2±24.9 vs. 100.9±28.5). PROS1 levels in CD were lower, although not significantly in the Small bowel involvement (80.3±15.8) compared with only colon (94.9±31). In CD disease behaviors and perianal disease did not show different levels. Conclusions: 1) PROS1 levels were significantly lower in CD vs. controls and UC. 2) In active CD, PROS 1 levels were different from controls, based on a decrease in the moderate-severe subgroup. Further studies will evaluate the impact of circulating PROS1 decrease in active CD and the activation of TAM receptors. These findings suggest that the decrease of PROS1 in CD could contribute to the increased risk of thrombosis and potentially to the inflammatory process of this disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies→French-language works237,207→