MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587759939

Risk factors for breast cancer in postmenopausal Caucasian and Chinese women.

2006· article· en· W2587759939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carolyn Tam, Gregory Hislop, Lisa J. Martin, Helen Guo, Salomon Minkin, Norman F. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographyMedicineBreast cancerMenarcheIncidence (geometry)AnthropometryEpidemiologyEthnic groupHormone replacement therapy (female-to-male)ResidenceRisk factors for breast cancerMenopauseCancerGynecologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B177 Background. Striking differences exist between countries in the incidence of breast cancer. The causes of these differences are unknown, but because incidence rates change in migrants, they are thought to be due to environmental rather than genetic differences. The goal of this research is to identify factors responsible for international differences in breast cancer risk. Methods . We have recruited Caucasian women, Chinese migrants to Canada who had lived in the West for less than 10 years, and women of Chinese ancestry who were born in the West, or who migrated to the West before age 21. All subjects were postmenopausal and aged 50 years or more. We obtained information on epidemiological risk factors by interview, and measured anthropometric characteristics. Results. Average length of residence in the West was 61 years for Caucasians (N=413), 62 years for women of Chinese ancestry born in the West (N=63), 40 years for Chinese who migrated early in life (N=153), and 7 years for recent Chinese migrants (N=421). Compared to Caucasians, recent Chinese migrants, weighed on average 14 kg less, and were 6 cms shorter. Recent migrants had menarche 1 year later than Caucasians, had menopause 0.6 year earlier, and were more often parous. Use of hormone replacement therapy was reported by 28% of recent Chinese migrants and 49% of Caucasians. 8% of recent migrants had at least one first degree relative with breast cancer, compared to 17% of Caucasians. 3% of recent migrants and 63% of Caucasians reported to have alcohol consumption at least once per week for 6 months or longer. 2% of recent migrants had smoked at least 1 cigarette per day for 3 months or longer, compared to 48% of Caucasians. Women of Chinese ancestry born in the West and early Chinese migrants had values for most of these variables that were intermediate between those of Caucasians and recent Chinese migrants. Conclusions. The differences observed between the 4 groups in this study strongly suggest that differences in risk of breast cancer between them are, at least in part, the result of differences in exposure to several known risk factors for breast cancer, and that levels of these risk factors are influenced by environmental factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology and Prevention BiomarkersSame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207