MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587772896 · doi:10.1182/blood.v104.11.608.608

Phase II Trial of Bortezomib in Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

2004· article· en· W2587772896 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Belch, C. Tom Kouroukis, Michael Crump, Laurie H. Sehn, Randy D. Gascoyne, Richard Klasa, Jean Powers, Elizabeth A. Eisenhauer

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchBC Cancer AgencyPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBortezomibMantle cell lymphomaNauseaInternal medicineSurgeryNeutropeniaAdverse effectChillsVomitingProgressive diseasePhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyChemotherapyMultiple myelomaLymphoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the results of a phase II trial of an investigational new drug bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade) for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Advanced stage previously untreated patients or those given up to two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Additional entry criteria included measurable nodal disease, minimum laboratory requirements, and written informed consent. Central pathology review, to confirm eligibility and the presence of cyclin D1, was required after study entry. Accrual was closed July 2004 having reached the preplanned target of 30 patients. Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV bolus was given days 1, 4, 8 and 11 in 3-week cycles. Patients were assessed by CT scanning after every two cycles of therapy and response assessed according to International Working Group recommendations (Cheson B, J Clin Oncol 1999). Non progressors were to receive a maximum of 4 cycles. Responding patients were to receive bortezomib for 2 cycles following documentation of maximal partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). To date demographic data are available on 26 patients. The median age was 67 (48–78 yrs), all had stage 3 or 4 disease (55% bone marrow involvement), 7 were female and 10 had received no prior chemotherapy. A median of 4 treatment cycles has been given (range 1–7) and 25 patients are evaluable for toxicity. Grade ≥ 2 adverse effects thought to be related to study drug occurred as follows: anorexia 8%, nausea 16%, vomiting 4%, diarrhea 20%, fatigue 60%, dizziness 4%, sensory neuropathy 12%, edema 8%, hypotension 4%, vascular leak syndrome 4%, arthralgia 12%, myalgia 12%, neuropathic pain 12%, dyspnea 12%, rash 12%. Nine patients discontinued therapy because of toxic effects (6 of whom had neuropathy or myalgia). During accrual of the first 14 patients, 5 serious adverse events occurred in patients with pre-existing edema, dyspnea, and/or effusion. Therefore, the eligibility criteria were amended to exclude such patients thereafter and no further serious adverse events have occurred. To date, 24 patients are evaluable for response. Of the 10 patients having no prior chemotherapy there were 3 PR (range 2.5–14.8m) 6 SD (1.3–13.6m) and 1 PD for a response of 30%. Of the 14 previously treated patients we obtained 1 CRu (14.1m), 4 PR (2.4–13.1m), 7 SD (1.2–14.3m) and 2 PD. The overall response rate is 33% (95% C.I. 16–55%) but interestingly it is similar in both previously untreated and treated groups. We conclude that bortezomib is an active agent in mantle cell lymphoma, but at this dose and schedule complete remission is rare. Since higher doses will not be possible given the frequency of neuropathy and myalgia, alternative schedules or novel combinations with other active agents will be of interest to pursue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207