MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587824109 · doi:10.1002/2016rs006184

Dynamic analysis of the polar ionosphere using the GPS signal: Toward an optimization of the cutoff scale

2017· article· en· W2587824109 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStatistical Mechanics and Entropy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsScintillationPhysicsTsallis entropyAmplitudeGaussianStatistical physicsWaveletComputational physicsOpticsComputer scienceDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Using Global Navigation Satellite System observations, such as the amplitude and the phase components of the GPS L1 signal, ionospheric scintillation is characterized and quantified using indices derived from those observables. However, the background electron density of the ionosphere is not stationary, presenting a trend and a nonzero mean, and the GPS motion induces a Doppler shift that will contribute to the nonstationary aspect of the signal; hence, the multiscale nature of the diffracted signal makes it difficult to extract the components of the signal that correspond to scintillation. Constructing scintillation indices from a signal that has a nonscintillation component will lead to erroneous estimation and biased characterization of the scintillation. In this context, we present a technique aiming at retrieving the scintillation components from the raw, transionospheric radio signals. Using wavelet analysis, we define and maximize the entropy of the system, which is composed of two subsystems corresponding to scintillation and nonscintillation contributions. The Tsallis entropy has been considered for the power component, for which a non‐Gaussian behavior has been observed. This entropy is based on a nonextensive approach that introduces a parameter q , quantifying the nonextensivity. On the other hand, the phase presents a Gaussian behavior and is analyzed using the Shannon‐Gibbs entropy. In both cases, the optimum cutoff scale, delimiting the scintillation components, is estimated via the maximization of the entropy, which, as defined here, is a function of the temporal scale. This optimization of the cutoff scale will be key in the construction of an optimum, unbiased index quantifying the ionospheric scintillation using GPS signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it