MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587837893 · doi:10.5114/jhi.2016.65346

Report from the Conference on Smoke-free Poland, Ministry of Health, Warsaw, Poland, 18 May 2016

2016· article· en· W2587837893 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mateusz Zatoński

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health Inequalities · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministrySmokeGeographyPublic healthPolitical scienceMedicineLawNursingMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urszula BlicharzPedagogue, Director of the Board of Education in Tarnów.One of the initiators and implementers of the programme involving schools in the promotion of recommendations of the European Code Against Cancer in Poland.The programme has been assessed by the European Cancer League as the best implementation of the code in Europe. Krzysztof czabańskiJournalist and Publicist.In the years 2015-2016, Secretary of State at the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2580.122

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health InequalitiesSame topicNutrition and Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207