pH-Controlled Electrolysis of Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide (EMD) for Improved Cycle Life of Rechargeable MnO<sub>2</sub>/Zn Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A systematic study of the effect of acid concentration (0.5–5 M H2SO4) on the electrolysis of electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD or γ-MnO2) has been performed. All the samples were characterized for their phase and crystallinity, their structural water, the pyrolusitic-to-ramsdellite ratio, BET surface area, pore size range; and were examined for their electrochemical performance. Concentration of the electrolysis acid affects the structural water content and the pyrolusitic-to-ramsdellite ratio of the γ-MnO2 phase as well as the surface area and pore size. The best cycling performance was achieved for the samples prepared with an electrolysis bath containing an acid concentration of about 2 M H2SO4. Electrochemical performance over 100 cycles of the EMD prepared in 2 M H2SO4 has shown higher energy efficiency and improved longer term cycling performance compared to commercial EMD products. Post-mortem analysis of the cycled EMD samples show partial loss of the EMD phase, loss of water content, and growth of irreversible manganese dioxide phases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".