MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587867458 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2016.7854856

An investigation of DC-link voltage and temperature variations on EV traction system design

2016· article· en· W2587867458 on OpenAlexaff
Nan Zhao, N. Schofield, Rong Yang, Ran Gu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraction (geology)VoltageElectric vehicleAutomotive engineeringInstallationTraction substationElectrical engineeringTraction motorComputer sciencePower (physics)EngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsTransformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DC-link voltage and temperature variations are critical issues when designing an electric vehicle (EV) traction system. The paper presents an assessment of electric vehicle power-train options based on the Nissan Leaf vehicle, which is taken as a benchmark system providing same validation for the study. The Nissan Leaf traction machine is evaluated and performance assessed by considering DC-link voltage and temperature variations. An alternative traction machine design is proposed to satisfy the specification. The vehicle power-train is then modified with the inclusion of a DC/DC converter between the battery pack and DC-link to maintain the traction system DC-link voltage near constant. Additionally, inclusion of a supercapacitor system presents a much tighter input voltage specification but still doesn't completely eliminate the issue. Finally, installing a DC/DC converter to mitigate the faulted operation of electric machine drive is reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207