MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

High Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Clearance Predicts Severity of Gut Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) In Children

2010· article· en· W2587907968 on OpenAlexaff
L. Hagen, Tal Schechter, Adam Gassas, John Doyle

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationGraft-versus-host diseaseGastroenterologyInternal medicineTransplantationMethotrexateImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1242 The clinical evaluation and management of gut GVHD is a significant challenge in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is often difficult to obtain pathological evidence to confirm the GVHD diagnosis and/or determine response to treatment. The severity of the disease itself may not just be related to the associated classic symptoms. Our objective herein was to prospectively study the effect of gut GVHD on protein losing enteropathy (PLE) as measured by alpha-1 antitrypsin clearance (AATC) in stools. Thirteen patients who were diagnosed with gut GVHD by clinical criteria were recruited; 5 patients were excluded as 4 had gut GVHD ruled out by biopsy and 1 was unable to complete study due to stool collection issues. Therefore, 8 patients; 6 males and 2 females, were studied. The median age was 9.5 years (range 6–17). Diagnoses included ALL (4), AML (2), Lymphoma (1) and Adrenoleukodystrophy (1). Donor types were; 7 unrelated (BM n=4 and cord n=3) one matched related BM donor. All patients received cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis, in addition 4 patients also received methotrexate and 3 others received prednisone as the second agent. All patients had negative stool EM for viruses and cultures for C.difficile on their first collection. Two 24 hour stool collections were taken from each patient at a mean of 8.5d (range 7–13d) apart. Patients’ gut GVHD staging is summarized in Table 1.Table 1:Summary of Stage gut GVHD and PLEPatientsAATC Median(range)normal = <22Stool outputml/kg/d Median(range)Stage of gutGVHD (n=)# with PLECollection #1831 (3-339)28 (10-109)Stg 1 (2) 4/8Stg 2 (3)Stg 3 (1)Stg 4 (2)Collection #2856 (8-561)19 (0-85) Stg 1 (0) 5/8Stg 2 (0)Stg 3 (3)Stg 4 (1) At the time of 1st collection, 6 patients had ≥ stage II gut GVHD and at 2nd collection 4 patients had ≥stage II gut GVHD and 4 collections were of non-diarrheal stool. A total of 7 stool collections were taken at a diagnosis of ≥stage III gut GVHD. Mean alpha-1 antitrypsin clearance (AATC) from all 16 collections was 143 mls/day (range 3–561), levels >22 mls/day indicate the diagnosis of protein-losing enteropathy (PLE). Nine of the collections (56%) showed PLE with a mean AATC of 247mls/day (range 31–561). Six out of the 7 samples from patients with ≥stage III gut GVHD were positive for PLE. Five collections with stool volumes >30 ml/kg/day were positive for PLE. Stool volumes were significantly higher on second collection (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, p = 0.003) consistent with the second stool collections being significantly more likely to have an elevated AATC, therefore more severe PLE over time (p<0.001). We conclude that a highly significant positive correlation exists between the severity of PLE and the stage of gut GVHD, particularly obvious in patients with stage 3–4 GVHD (ANOVA, p=0.015). See Table 2.Table 2:Stage of gut GVHD and AATCStage ofGVHDNumber ofcollectionsMeanAATCStd.Deviation0426.0020.801217.0019.802384.67136.2934171.50176.2143406.33134.32 When patients were grouped as stage 0–2 GVHD vs. stage 3–4 GVHD, those with stage 3–4 GVHD had significantly higher AATC values (p =0.02). Despite the small number of patients recruited, this study emphasizes the need to consider PLE as a useful aspect of the clinical picture. We suggest that in order to see a response to therapy and therefore a decrease in AATC, clinicians should not repeat stool collections before 2 weeks from the initiation of therapy. In light of the significant morbidity and mortality associated with grade 3 and 4 gut GVHD, and as an important therapeutic decision for these patients, one may consider escalating GVHD therapy if a patient's AATC is rising. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→