MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587934895 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2016.7855532

Torque ripple reduction of a variable flux motor

2016· article· en· W2587934895 on OpenAlexaff
Amirmasoud Takbash, Maged Ibrahim, Pragasen Pillay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorque rippleAlnicoDirect torque controlControl theory (sociology)TorqueMagnetRotor (electric)Finite element methodYoke (aeronautics)Stall torqueSwitched reluctance motorRippleTorque motorEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials sciencePhysicsMechanical engineeringElectrical engineeringStructural engineeringInduction motorControl systemVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines torque ripple in a new topology of variable flux machine with AlNiCo magnet. To reduce the torque ripple, the design and finite element modeling of this machine are reviewed and the finite element model results are verified with the prototyped motor. The effects of various electrical, magnetic and geometrical parameters such as load, magnetization level of the magnet, tooth and yoke width and magnet dimensions, on both torque mean value and torque ripple are discussed using the verified finite element model. Finally, modified rotor structure is presented that reduces the torque ripple by 35% with the same torque mean value and magnetization current for the motor. The torque ripple of the modified design is analyzed for a wide range of load and speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207