MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Splicing Profile of Human Hyaluronan Synthase 1 (HAS1) Is Altered by Mutagenesis of (A/U)GGG Motifs.

2009· article· en· W2587966757 on OpenAlexaff
Jitra Kriangkum, Anirban Ghosh, Amanda Warkentin, Andrew R. Belch, Linda M. Pilarski

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinigeneExonIntronRNA splicingBiologyMolecular biologyExon trappingGeneticsExonic splicing enhancerAlternative splicingGeneRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2842 Poster Board II-818 In addition to full length (FL) transcripts, clinically significant HAS 1 splice variants (Va, Vb and Vc) have been previously identified in multiple myeloma (MM) and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Increased HAS1Vb expression correlates with poor survival in a cohort of MM patients. Here, we show that directed mutation of HAS1 intron 3 alters HAS1 splicing and generates a pattern of HAS1 variant expression that mimics patterns detected in MM patients. This suggests that hypermutation of HAS1 and consequent expression of HAS1 splice variants may contribute to oncogenesis in MM. HAS1FL comprises of 5 exons (2089 bp); Va skips exon 4 (133 bp); Vb skips exon 4 and partially retains 59 bp of intron upstream of exon 5 (+59); Vc has all 5 exons and partially retains 26 bp of intron downstream of exon 4. In MM, frequent intronic mutations have been observed in introns 3 and 4, suggesting possible contributions to HAS1 alternative splicing. We have utilized a mammalian expression system to analyse HAS1 splicing by fusing a minigene extending from exon 3 to exon 5 (g345) with the upstream cDNA sequences. HAS1 expression is determined by transfection and RT-PCR using appropriated primer sets. This study focuses on identification of intronic mutations that may affect HAS1 splicing. We target mutations on (A/U)GGG motif because of its high abundance in HAS1 intron 3. The (A/U)GGG repeat was also shown to enhance the splicing of alternative intron in chicken β-tropomyosin (Sirand-Pugnet, P, et al, NAR, 1995, 23, 3501) and intronic G runs could work in a combinatorial way to control the selection of the proper 3' splice site in human thrombopoietin (Marcucci, R, et al, NAR, 2006, 35, 132). A 580 bp long human HAS1 intron 3 is GC-rich and comprises of 28 (A/U)GGG motifs (sequentially identified as G1, G2.., G28). HeLa cells transfected with an unmutated intron 3 construct mainly produce FL with a small amount of HAS1Va, a profile that is similar to CD40L/IL-4 activated normal B cells. Site directed mutagenesis of all 28 (A/U)GGG motifs (G1-28) abolished FL expression, but not HAS1Va, suggesting that these sequence alterations are highly unfavorable for constitutive splicing. It may be due to the loss of essential cis-acting element(s) and/or undesirable conformational changes that prevent spliceosome formation. Mutagenesis of G1-18 is shown to eliminate constitutive expression by increasing the usage of multiple alternative donor sites. Mutagenesis of G19-28 produces more HAS1Va than FL, presumably due to increased exon 4 skipping events. An increased Va/FL ratio could also be achieved by mutagenesis of G25-28 or G27-28, suggesting that this subregion is important for pathway selection. Mutagenesis was also studied in del1 construct, a unique derivative of HAS1 minigene that partially deletes intron 4. Similar to g345, del1 produces FL and HAS1Va as well as promotes expression of novel HAS1Vd, an isoform that includes +59 bp (like Vb) and exon 4. Alteration of HAS1 splicing profile caused by mutagenesis shown in g345 series is also observed in del1 series. Additionally, there is a shift from Vd to Vb expression in all constructs analysed (del1/G1-28, del1/G1-18, del1/G19-28, del1/G25-28 and del1/G27-28), a pattern of aberrant splicing that found in MM patients. Thus, in del1, increased exon 4 skipping events promote both Va and Vb expression. Sequencing of HAS1 intron 3 in a cohort of 50 MM patients indicates that recurrent mutations are found in the G repeat regions and that new repeats are generated by recurrent MM-specific HAS1 mutations. This suggests that mutation of the HAS1 construct mimics HAS1 mutation events that occur in MM patients themselves, and contributes to the clinically significant aberrant HAS1 splicing we have reported in MM (Adamia et al. Blood, 2008, 112, 5111; Blood, 2005, 105, 4836). Overall, critical mutations that could alter HAS1 expression and the ratio of HAS1 variants to FL were identified in intron 3. In intron 4, critical mutations that increase the usage of alternative splice site (+59) remain to be studied. We speculate that cumulative mutations within these two intronic sequences could bring the two events together to promote HAS1Vb splicing. While trans-acting elements are likely to regulate RNA splicing and its pathway, our studies clearly suggest that intronic mutations play an important role in the aberrant splicing of human HAS1, with probable contributions to disease progression in MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→