MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587972025

Measurements of Spatial and Temporal Variations in Ice Impact Pressures

2015· article· en· W2587972025 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Regina Sopper, Robert Gagnon, Claude Daley, Bruce Colbourne

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencySamsungAmerican Bureau of Shipping
KeywordsClimatologyGeologyEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents results of laboratory experiments involving a 1 m diameter ice cone colliding with an instrumented panel (Impact Module). The tests were performed using a double pendulum apparatus that provided high impact energy. Images taken with a high speed camera at 500 fps from within the Impact Module provide information about the true contact area and pressure distribution during the collision. The acquired images were translated into pressure distributions using a specifically developed software routine. These data are compared to the output of a separate pressure sensor located in the centre of the Impact Module. The images show increasing contact area as the collision proceeds and capture sudden losses of area as ice fracture and spalling occurred. Observations such as significant spalling events in the vicinity of the central pressure sensor are also reflected in its recordings. The results provide maps of the temporal and spatial variations in contact pressure, contact area and force as an ice impact progresses at speeds typical of impacts that might occur with icebreaking ships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207