MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588017519 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2017.1295403

A systems-based approach to manage strawberry virus diseases

2017· article· en· W2588017519 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Ioannis E. Tzanetakis, Robert R. Martín

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorth American Strawberry Grower's AssociationU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsYield (engineering)BiologyCropVirusBiotechnologyCultivarIdentification (biology)Virus diseasesSelection (genetic algorithm)FragariaVirologyAgronomyHorticultureComputer scienceBotanyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the turn of the 21st century, there has been a significant increase in the number of viruses known to infect strawberry. This is due in part to advances in detection technologies, which allow for the identification of agents associated with graft-transmissible diseases, and the expansion of both crop production and virus vectors into new geographic areas. This paper identifies the virus diseases affecting strawberry in North America and summarizes steps and measures that can be taken to minimize their impact on strawberry yield, starting from cultivar selection to nursery propagation and field production. The implementation of these measures can minimize virus impact on strawberry yield and fruit quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207