MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588034453 · doi:10.1134/s1995080217010218

Improved estimation of kurtosis parameters for two multivariate populations

2017· article· en· W2588034453 on OpenAlexaff
Nighat Zahra, Supranee Lisawadi, S. Ejaz Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueLobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersThammasat University
KeywordsEstimatorMathematicsKurtosisMultivariate statisticsQuadratic equationApplied mathematicsStatisticsParametric statisticsRange (aeronautics)Asymptotic distribution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improved estimators for the kurtosis parameters of two multivariate populations are developed under the assumption that they are equal. Shrinkage and preliminary test estimators are proposed and their asymptotic properties are presented analytically and numerically. Comparisons of the suggested estimators are made on the basis of their asymptotic distributional biases and asymptotic quadratic risks. It is observed that the suggested estimators perform better than the estimator based on the sample data only in a wider range of parametric space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLobachevskii Journal of MathematicsSame topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207