MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588035946 · doi:10.1145/3011141.3011171

An ambient assisted living nighttime wandering system for elderly

2016· article· en· W2588035946 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Radziszewski, Hubert Kenfack Ngankam, Hélène Pigot, Vincent Grégoire, Dominique Lorrain, Sylvain Giroux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHome automationRobustness (evolution)Activities of daily livingAssisted livingAmbient intelligenceHuman–computer interactionDementiaAssistive technologyIndependent livingLiving roomPsychologyMedicineEngineeringTelecommunicationsGerontologyArchitectural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Assistive living technologies provide good results for the support of specific activities transforming a home into a smart home. In this paper, we present a personalized ambient support system for elderly suffering from Alzheimer's dementia and nighttime wandering. Our goal is to help the person stay at home as long as possible and regain a regular circadian cycle while providing more comfort to the caregiver. The intervention proceeds in two phases. During the monitoring phase, the system determines the resident profile based on nighttime routines. Data is gathered from sensors dispatched in the smart home, coupled with physiological data obtained from worn sensors. Data is then classified to determine engine rules that will provide assistance to the resident to satisfy his needs. In the second phase, assistance is provided to the person by triggering rules depending on the activities occurring during night. It offers a calm environment with music and visual icons to soothe the person then encourage it to return to bed. The system is installed at the Alzheimer's home using wireless technologies. Multiple heterogeneous technologies are put in common to achieve it. Reliabilities and robustness tests were carried out in a 4 1/2 room apartment for 3 months with over 3.78 million collected data tuples. These tests have established three clusters of activities necessary for the recognition of nighttime wandering activities. This helped start an ongoing experiment in homes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207