MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588038427 · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00838

Cultures of the Marine Bacterium <i>Pseudovibrio denitrificans</i> Ab134 Produce Bromotyrosine-Derived Alkaloids Previously Only Isolated from Marine Sponges

2017· article· en· W2588038427 on OpenAlexafffund
Karen de Jesus Nicácio, Laura P. Ióca, Adriana M. Fróes, Luciana Leomil, Luciana Appolinario, Christiane C. Thompson, Fabiano L. Thompson, Antônio G. Ferreira, David E. Williams, Raymond J. Andersen, Alessandra S. Eustáquio, Roberto G. S. Berlinck

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Products · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMarine Sponges and Natural Products
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsSpongeBacteriaBiologyMarine bacteriophageMicrobiologyIsolation (microbiology)StereochemistryChemistryBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein we report the isolation and spectroscopic identification of fistularin-3 (1), 11-hydroxyaerothionin (2), and verongidoic acid (3), as well as the UPLC-HRMS detection of aerothionin (4), homopurpuroceratic acid B (5), purealidin L (6), and aplysinamisine II (7), from cultures of the marine bacterium Pseudovibrio denitrificans Ab134, isolated from tissues of the marine sponge Arenosclera brasiliensis. These results unambiguously demonstrate for the first time that bromotyrosine-derived alkaloids that were previously isolated only from Verongida sponges can be biosynthesized by a marine bacterium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural ProductsSame topicMarine Sponges and Natural ProductsFrench-language works237,207