Eujanian, Alejandro: El pasado en el péndulo de la política. Rosas, la provincia y la nación en el debate político de Buenos Aires, 1852-1861, Bernal, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2015.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fecha de aprobación: 10/11/2016Qué ocurre cuando una sociedad percibe su realidad como el comienzo de una nueva etapa signada por veloces cambios?¿Qué respuestas formula al desafío de superar los viejos antagonismos, enemistades y conflictos que la dividieron durante décadas?¿Cómo dar sentido a un presente de lucha e incertidumbre para proyectarlo a un futuro mínimamente previsible?El libro de Alejandro Eujanian examina las respuestas que la elite bonaerense formuló a estos interrogantes en la década de 1850.Respuestas que, como señala, tuvieron en la historia y el debate sobre el pasado una de sus más destacadas herramientas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".