MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Edmonton’s New Walterdale Bridge

2017· article· en· W2588089183 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cameron Montgomery, Kris Lima, Steven Prozniak, Shiraz Kanji

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Engineering International · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeckAbutmentBridge (graph theory)TrussBermArchEngineeringStructural engineeringSpan (engineering)GeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Replacing an existing century-old truss bridge in the North Saskatchewan River Valley, the new Walterdale Bridge is a signature structure located in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The new bridge is a twin through-arch steel structure, spanning 206 m from bank to bank. It carries three lanes of northbound traffic, a sidewalk and a separate shared-use path for pedestrians and cyclists. The steel arch ribs are founded on thrust blocks that resist axial forces and moments by the interaction of inclined footings and micropile anchors with the surrounding bedrock. Construction of the ribs proceeded in stages by supporting the end sections from towers on berms, transporting the assembled central sections on the river by floating them on barges, lifting the ribs into their final position and connecting them to the previously erected end sections. The deck and shared-use path were stick-built starting from each abutment and moving towards the mid-span by sequentially supporting new sections from previously erected members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructural Engineering InternationalSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207