MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy and Safety of Eltrombopag in Elderly Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia: Analysis of Five Clinical Trials,

2011· article· en· W2588144806 on OpenAlexaff
Harold J. Olney, Ingrid Pabinger, Bhabita Mayer, Kalpana Bakshi, Christine K. Bailey, Andrés Brainsky

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEltrombopagMedicineInternal medicineAdverse effectPlaceboChronic myelomonocytic leukemiaInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemImmune thrombocytopeniaMyelodysplastic syndromesSurgeryPlateletBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3294 Introduction: Patients (pts) with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) with platelet counts persistently <30,000/μL are at risk for severe and even fatal bleeding events; this risk increases with age. Risk for major non-fatal hemorrhage has been estimated at 3% per year for pts <40 years and 71% per year for pts >60. The 5-year risk of fatal hemorrhage has been estimated at 2% for pts <40 years and 48% for pts >60 (Cohen 2000). Eltrombopag, an oral, nonpeptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of chronic ITP, stimulates bone marrow progenitor cells, promoting differentiation and proliferation of megakaryocytes and platelet production. No data have been reported on the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag specifically in elderly pts. Aim: To assess efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in pts ≥65 years. Methods: A retrospective analysis by age was completed for 446 adult chronic ITP pts receiving eltrombopag in 5 clinical trials: two 6-week and one 6-month placebo-controlled studies (TRA100773A/B, RAISE); an open-label study with pts treated intermittently in 3 cycles of up to 6 weeks (REPEAT); and an ongoing extension study (EXTEND) of 299 pts who completed a prior eltrombopag trial. Bleeding was assessed prospectively using the WHO Bleeding Scale and using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. Results: Pts receiving eltrombopag in each trial aged 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 are shown in the Table. In the 6-week trials, response was defined as platelets ≥50,000/μL at day 43. In TRA100773A (eltrombopag 50 mg), response was achieved by 67% of pts aged 18–49 and 50–64, and 100% in pts ≥65. In TRA100773B, response was achieved by 50% of pts 18–49, 64% of pts 50–64, and 74% of pts ≥65. In RAISE, at any given visit, 40–53% of pts aged 18–49, 40–61% aged 50–64, and 42–75% ≥65 responded (platelets >50,000/μL and <400,000/μL). In REPEAT, response (platelets ≥50,000/μL and ≥2x baseline) in all 3 cycles was achieved by 67%, 72%, and 83% of pts who responded in Cycle 1, in the 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 groups. In EXTEND, 84%, 94%, and 86% of pts aged 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 had a response (platelets ≥50,000/μL); 15, 18, and 6 of these pts had platelets ≥50,000/μL at baseline. In EXTEND, 66%, 73%, and 78% of pts aged 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 responded for >50% of assessments and 43%, 48%, and 53% for >75% of assessments. Across all 5 studies, pts aged 18–49 (n=220), 50–64 (n=148), and ≥65 (n=78) were treated with eltrombopag for a median (range) of 399 (5–1255), 484.5 (5–1302), and 244.5 (2–1267) days; median daily dose was 53 mg for pts 18–49 and 50 mg each for pts 50–64 and ≥65. The most common adverse events (AEs) (headache, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, and diarrhea) across all 5 studies were reported in similar proportions of pts across age groups. Fatigue, arthralgia, constipation, and cataracts were more common in elderly pts (11%, 10%, 5%, and 4% for pts 18–49 vs 19% each for pts ≥65). Thromboembolic events were reported in 4 (2%), 5 (3%), and 7 (9%) pts aged 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65. No age specific trend toward arterial vs venous events was observed. Proportions of liver enzymes elevation and bone marrow reticulin grade ≥2 were similar across age groups. Bleeding serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 7% of pts aged 18–49 and 50–64, and 3% of pts ≥65. The most common bleeding SAEs were GI and CNS events, with no apparent difference in proportion of pts among age groups. Two pts experienced a fatal bleeding event (GI and CNS hemorrhages) 55 and 107 days after stopping eltrombopag; both were 18–49 and never responded to eltrombopag. Conclusion: No significant difference in the safety or efficacy profile of eltrombopag was observed for elderly versus younger pts, although elderly pts seemed to exhibit slightly more robust responses and slightly more nonhemorrhagic AEs (including thrombosis), which are not unexpected in an elderly population. Disclosures: Olney: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pabinger:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mayer:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bakshi:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Bailey:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brainsky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207