MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588155486 · doi:10.1201/9781315375045-114

Feature of the vortex and the jet flows around and inside the three-row pile group

2016· article· en· W2588155486 on OpenAlexaff
A. V. Voskobijnyk, V. A. Voskoboinick, Oleksandr Voskoboinyk, Lidiia Tereshchenko, I Khizha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVortexJet (fluid)PileGroup (periodic table)PhysicsMechanicsGeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article the results of experimental research of kinematics and the dynamics of horseshoe vortex structures, wake vortices and lateral jet flows, formed around and inside the pile group of three-row grillage, set on a flat rigid surface and sand soil, are presented. Visualization of flow is conducted using water soluble coatings and contrast substances, introduced into the stream. The fields of velocity, pressure and shear stresses around and inside the pile construction were investigated using the miniature sensors of the velocity, dynamic pressure and pressure fluctuations. The place of formation and features of development of large-scale horseshoe vortex structures and wake vortices, and the hydrodynamic characteristics of the vortex and jet flow were determined. The space-time correlation and spectral characteristics of the velocity and pressure fluctuations were measured. The scale of the coherent vortex structures, their frequencies of rotations and oscillations, convective velocities and direction of transfer were determined. The three-dimensional spectrograms and correlograms of vortex and the jet flow about and inside the three-row pile grillage were obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsFrench-language works237,207