Fechner Day 2015 – Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is an honor to host in Quebec, for the second time, the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Quebec is the second oldest city in North America, and Fechner Day 2015 will actually be held in the Old Quebec. For one afternoon though, the participants to the meeting will be moved to a newer part of the city where is now located Laval University, one of the oldest universities of the continent. The meeting will begin with a keynote address by Bruce Schneider on the future of psychophysics, and will end on a series of talks by young psychophysicists. The meeting will include a series of talks and posters on several aspects of psychophysical research, and a brief “In memoriam” section dedicated to two long-standing members of the Society, Hannes Eisler and Bill Petrusic. We would like to thank Geoff Patching, an organizer of Fechner Day 2014, for transmitting his knowledge, Zhuanghua Shi and Jordan Schoenherr who are taking care of ISP website and communication, and the members of the executive committee. We would like to extend special thanks to the city of Quebec and the Faculty of Social Sciences of Laval University for their financial support. Finally, we also want to thank the personal of Hotel Clarendon for the most appreciated collaboration at various stages of the organization of the meeting. We hope that Fechner Day 2015 will be, as is the tradition, a fine mixture of stimulating intellectual discussions and friendly social interactions. Welcome to Quebec! Simon Grondin and Vincent Laflamme
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it